JAMA drops gag rule for whistle-blowers
Disclosure of potential conflicts in health care always seems like a great idea until people start asking questions about you.
The editors at JAMA, the Journal of the American Medical Association, found the tables turned when they sought to keep people who bring complaints about conflicts of study authors from going public with the allegations while the journal investigates. (To read the back story and the online JAMA editorial about the change, see this post from The Wall Street Journal Health Blog.)
Well, the JAMA editors have relented and an editorial published in the current issue of the journal drops the gag language while affirming the other elements of conflict policing.
In April, the Association of Health Care Journalists weighed in with a letter to JAMA calling the
policy “counterproductive” because “it could discourage potential whistle-blowers from coming forward with crucial information that physicians and the general public urgently need to make informed decisions about medical care.”
Comments
One Comment on JAMA drops gag rule for whistle-blowers
-
whistleblower lawyer on
Fri, 17th Jul 2009 8:24 am
We do not want whistleblowers to be intimidated. It is important that they feel comfortable and protected with sharing their information.
Please read our blog commenting policies.
-
Join us in Atlanta
for Health Journalism 2012
Fellowship applications
due Feb. 27
New at HealthJournalism.org
- Data gives depth to investigation of patient safety
- What reporters should know about Alzheimer’s and related dementias
- Apply for fellowships to attend Health Journalism 2012
- AHCJ asks Supreme Court to permit broadcast of arguments in health reform case
- Tips for print, online journalists to embrace broadcast opportunities
- Numbers reveal how often, or how rarely, states check doctors’ disciplinary records
- How I did it: Falsified charts in nursing homes linked to patient care
- Access Denied: Looking at a lack of health care availability
- Transparency & medical errors: Public reporting of patient harm is a potent force
