Nature survey: Scientists gain influence with blogs
As newspapers shrink, fold or migrate entirely to the Internet, what will happen to science journalism? Like other topics, coverage is becoming fractured and the likelihood that the public will find meaningful and important stories as readily as before is uncertain, at best, according to an interesting
A survey by the publication of 493 science journalists shows that jobs are being lost and the workloads of those who remain are on the rise - 18.5 percent reported their workloads have increased dramatically. At the same time, researcher-run blogs and Web sites are growing in both number and readership. Moreover, traditional journalists are increasingly looking to these sites to find story ideas, although there’s also an increasing reliance on press releases and public relations machines.
“Whether directly or indirectly, scientists and the institutions at which they work are having more influence than ever over what the public reads about their work,” according to the Nature story. That’s because press releases and blogs, typically, can’t reach the same widespread audiences as mainstream media. However, some bloggers are gaining a wider audience. One example is Derek Lowe, a Vertex Pharmaceuticals scientist who writes the “In the Pipeline” blog and columns for The Atlantic.
piece in the latest issue of Nature.
” … unlike books and lectures, science blogs operate with a quick turnaround that more closely resembles that of the traditional media.”
Whether such sites can compensate, at least in part, for the upheaval appears unlikely, according to one traditional journalist. Peter Dykstra, who was executive producer of CNN’s science, technology, environment and weather unit before it was closed down last year, and is now at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, worries that the flow of information is forever changed. Science and environment news, he tells Nature, will be “ghettoized and available only to those who choose to seek it out.”
In a related editorial, Nature urges scientists to change old attitudes and “recognize the contributions of bloggers and others, and they should encourage any and all experiments that could help science better penetrate the news cycle.”
Related
- Report, survey look at health care journalism
- Researchers study health bloggers, form community
- NEJM article critical of health reporting
- Survey unmasks health, medical journalists
- AHCJers write ‘blogs that will open your eyes’
Live updates from health blogging summit
Consumer Reports is hosting a “health blogger summit” at its headquarters today. According to Jeremiah at Z Recommends:
“Their (Consumers Union’s) idea is to get bloggers, reporters, and the folks at Consumer Reports together to discuss how we can share information with consumers to empower them in making choices for their health.”
Although AHCJ wasn’t invited to the event, we’ve been closely following the discussion on Twitter. Several of the participants have been kind enough to post updates on the conversation. Looks like there was a great deal of talk about rankings of doctors and hospitals, as well as how to deal with comments on blogs.
See the discussion in progress and then come back here and tell us what you think.
-
Join us in Omaha to find untold rural health stories
New at HealthJournalism.org
- AHCJ offers financial data about nonprofit hospitals
- Diversity in aging: Putting gray in the rainbow
- Southeast journalists eligible for regional fellowship program
- AHCJ-NLM Health Journalism Fellowship offers hands-on medical research training
- AHCJ announces 2011 winners of top health journalism awards
